walkah/net
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

imported posts

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
James Walker
2012-01-02 23:33:14 -05:00
parent ee4514f219
commit 9ceeea0bc1
334 changed files with 5471 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

17
_posts/2005-12-20-what-happens-when-web2-0-is-down.md Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
---
layout: post
title: what happens when web2.0 is down?
created: 1135063895
permalink: blog/what-happens-when-web2-0-is-down
tags: []
---
whether you care for the buzzwords or not, sites on the internet these days are *doing* a lot more than ever before. consequently they are much more complicated not only to build, but to maintain and just plain keep online. believe me, we run a site or two at <a href="http://www.bryght.com/" title="Bryght managed community hosting">bryght</a> and it has it's challenges. there's a whole lot of activity going on in a two-way data flow (syndication, aggregation, web service transactions, etc...). the web feels much more, well... entangled.
so, what happens when pieces fall off the map? what if they're big pieces?
case in point, two services that i use heavily every day <a href="http://del.icio.us/" title="del.icio.us" title="social bookmarks">del.icio.us</a> and <a href="http://www.bloglines.com/" title="rss reading">bloglines</a> have been offline for extended periods today (planned in the case of the latter- but still).
certainly, the world is not ending, nor am I particularly upset. I understand it happens <a href="http://support.bryght.com/">all too well</a>. but there are those (and I'd consider myself amongst them) who see this trend of inter-conneted sites publishing and subscribing to each other's data as the future. but, in my (rarely humble) opinion, we need to be really careful about where our data *lives*. certainly levels lower in <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OSI_model" title="OSI model">the stack</a> have always had to worry about this. and the internet is a big, resilient place. certainly, if say <a href="http://flickr.com/">flickr</a> were to disappear and never return it wouldn't be the *end* of the world right? I mean, we all paid for DVD backups of all our pictures, right? we could just re-upload, re-tag, re-instate that community somewhere else. no problem, right? yikes.
there's a lot to be said for decentralization.